I was reading an email, I believe it was, a couple days ago, that AT&T (I believe) is supporting the monopolizing of Internet. In doing this it's going against the idea of net neutrality and therefore free access to internet sites. I don't remember all the details, but it basically said that communications companies such as AT&T want to start charging users for certain services and uses of Internet such as the amount of time they spend online in a similar way that they charge for the amount of time customers spend with long distance calls on a wired phone. This weakens the free access to information that the Constitution guarantees. It also lessons the flow of user traffic to authors' promotion of their work.
As I said, I don't remember the exact details, but here's a couple of articles that should give you a good idea of the issue:
http://www.freepress.net/press-release/2010/7/21/free-press-disappointed-fcc-decision-defend-discredited-media-ownership-rule
http://www.freepress.net/press-release/2010/7/22/free-press-responds-reports-t-mobile-abandoning-net-neutrality
I hope laws that allow such company ownership of the Internet won't go through. I would look the Free Press Website over to see how you can participate in preventing this sort of thing from happening. The "Save the Internet" project is a good example. They're at http://www.savetheinternet.com/
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

I didn't know much about any of it, so this was interesting!
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading this article—it's always great to find content that provides practical insights instead of just repeating the same information. While researching similar topics, I also came across a few resources that might be useful for other readers: inaivideo.com for AI video creation, us-freelancer.com for freelancing resources, us-userway.com for accessibility-related information, and a helpful guide on tubemagic alternative free. Thanks again for sharing such a valuable post—I always enjoy discovering helpful resources through articles like this!
ReplyDelete